Inherently Radiopaque Narrow-Size-Calibrated Microspheres: Proof of Principle in a Pig Embolization Model.

PURPOSE: To investigate radiopacity, size and size calibration, morphology, and vascular distribution of inherently radiopaque microspheres in vitro and in a pig embolization model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared three types of microspheres: DCBead™ (size 100-300 µm) and Embozene™ (250 µm) as clinically established microspheres, and the prototype Visible (250 µm) that contains additional radiopaque material. Size and size calibration of microspheres were examined by laser diffraction. Pulmonary artery embolization was performed in 12 pigs, and radiopacity was examined by in vitro micro-computed tomography (CT), in vivo cone-beam CT, and ex vivo micro-CT after killing. Morphology and vascular distribution of microspheres were microscopically examined. RESULTS: In in vitro and ex vivo micro-CT, radiopacity of Visible was higher than that of Embozene™, whereas DCBead™ showed no radiopacity. In in vivo cone-beam CT, radiopacity was observed with Visible but not with Embozene™ and DCBead™. Laser diffraction revealed that 7.0% (Visible), 6.5% (Embozene™), and 22.5% (DCBead™) of microspheres were smaller than 223.5 µm. Visible and Embozene™ microspheres were very often located in bronchiolus-associated arteries, but rarely in subsegmental and capillary arteries, whereas DCBead™ were very often and often detected in bronchiolus-associated arteries and capillary arteries, respectively (and rarely in subsegmental arteries). CONCLUSION: After pulmonary artery embolization, Visible but not Embozene™ or DCBead™ provide in vivo radiopacity in cone-beam CT. In contrast to non-narrow-size-calibrated DCBead™, pulmonary artery embolization with narrow-size-calibrated Visible and Embozene™ result in a predictable arterial distribution without embolization-related hemorrhagic lung infarction.

Sphere-enhanced microwave ablation (sMWA) versus bland microwave ablation (bMWA): technical parameters, specific CT 3D rendering and histopathology.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare technical parameters during ablation as well as CT 3D rendering and histopathology of the ablation zone between sphere-enhanced microwave ablation (sMWA) and bland microwave ablation (bMWA). METHODS: In six sheep-livers, 18 microwave ablations were performed with identical system presets (power output: 80 W, ablation time: 120 s). In three sheep, transarterial embolisation (TAE) was performed immediately before microwave ablation using spheres (diameter: 40 ± 10 µm) (sMWA). In the other three sheep, microwave ablation was performed without spheres embolisation (bMWA). Contrast-enhanced CT, sacrifice, and liver harvest followed immediately after microwave ablation. Study goals included technical parameters during ablation (resulting power output, ablation time), geometry of the ablation zone applying specific CT 3D rendering with a software prototype (short axis of the ablation zone, volume of the largest aligned ablation sphere within the ablation zone), and histopathology (hematoxylin-eosin, Masson Goldner and TUNEL). RESULTS: Resulting power output/ablation times were 78.7 ± 1.0 W/120 ± 0.0 s for bMWA and 78.4 ± 1.0 W/120 ± 0.0 s for sMWA (n.s., respectively). Short axis/volume were 23.7 ± 3.7 mm/7.0 ± 2.4 cm(3) for bMWA and 29.1 ± 3.4 mm/11.5 ± 3.9 cm(3) for sMWA (P < 0.01, respectively). Histopathology confirmed the signs of coagulation necrosis as well as early and irreversible cell death for bMWA and sMWA. For sMWA, spheres were detected within, at the rim, and outside of the ablation zone without conspicuous features. CONCLUSIONS: Specific CT 3D rendering identifies a larger ablation zone for sMWA compared with bMWA. The histopathological signs and the detectable amount of cell death are comparable for both groups. When comparing sMWA with bMWA, TAE has no effect on the technical parameters during ablation.